<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chui's counterpoint &#187; firewall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmountainsw.com/wordpress/archives/tag/firewall/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmountainsw.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>pulling the rug</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:35:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NAT Traversal Techniques</title>
		<link>http://www.redmountainsw.com/wordpress/archives/nat-traversal-techniques</link>
		<comments>http://www.redmountainsw.com/wordpress/archives/nat-traversal-techniques#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chui</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tunneling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmountainsw.com/wordpress/archives/nat-traversal-techniques</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ability of applications like Ultravnc and Hamachi to operate behind firewalls through NAT traversal intrigued me. Newport Networks has a whitepaper detailing current NAT traversal solutions for SIP:

Universal Plug and Play (UPnP)
Problem: &#8230; relies on the NAT opening pinholes to the outside world under the dynamic control of the UPnP client &#8211; maybe a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ability of applications like <a href="http://www.uvnc.com/addons/nat2nat.html">Ultravnc</a> and <a href="http://www.hamachi.cc">Hamachi</a> to operate behind firewalls through NAT traversal <a href="http://www.redmountainsw.com/wordpress/archives/creating-tcp-connection-with-both-computers-behind-firewalls">intrigued me</a>. Newport Networks has a whitepaper detailing current <a href="http://www.newport-networks.com/whitepapers/nat-traversal2.html">NAT traversal solutions</a> for SIP:</p>
<ul>
<li>Universal Plug and Play (UPnP)</li>
<p>Problem: &#8230; relies on the NAT opening pinholes to the outside world under the dynamic control of the UPnP client &#8211; maybe a SoftPhone on a PC. This capability is most likely contrary to most security policies and therefore may not be accepted by communications managers of corporate customers.</p>
<li>Simple Traversal of UDP Through Network Address Translation devices (STUN)</li>
<p>Problem: Most NATs in use today are symmetric. This means that they create a mapping based on source IP address and port number as well as the destination IP address and port number. STUN will not work with symmetric NATs</p>
<li>TURN &#8211; Traversal Using Relay NAT</li>
<p>Refinement over STUN by using a proxy to relay packets</p>
<li>Application Layer Gateway</li>
<p>Enhanced NAT that can modify packets depending on whether protocol is SIP, or some other. However, it doesn&#8217;t really explain how a SIP phone behind a firewall can receive inbound calls. (UDP sessions are easier than TCP sessions?)</p>
<li>Manual Configuration</li>
<li>Tunnel Techniques</li>
<li>Automatic Channel Mapping</li>
</ul>
<p>On the practical side of things, Heise Security has a light write-up on how Skype tries different methods, from <a href="http://www.heise-online.co.uk/security/How-Skype-Co-get-round-firewalls--/features/82481/1">direct UDP through to probing firewalls in order to tunnel a direct connection between two computers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redmountainsw.com/wordpress/archives/nat-traversal-techniques/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
